 
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Overshadowing the Negative: The American Industrial Revolution
Industrialization changed the face of America when it first made it’s impression in the 19th century, namely the 1850s and later. The Industrial Revolution had already swept across Europe and then made it across the Atlantic to the United States. Industrialization had many long reaching effects on the United States, including the economic difference between the Northern and Southern states, one of the causes of the Civil War. The advent of factories and mass production kicked the Northern states into high gear, but also led to bad relations with the South, where the economy was based solely on agriculture. Industrialization also linked the states together with railroads, allowed goods to be made quicker and sold at a more rapid pace through manufacturing, and improved the economy of the nation. The beneficial effects of industrialization have longer lasting and more important impacts than the disadvantageous effects.
The period of American industrialization served as a mark of independence for the young nation. By being able to produce its own goods, America no longer had to rely on foreign nations to acquire manufactured materials. Andrew Carnegie was an entrepreneur who used the new business practices to improve America’s railroads without the help of England. Instead of importing the steel, Carnegie bought the mines that produced it. He had direct access to the resources he needed, so the government did not have to rely on a European nation. In his memoirs, Thomas Jefferson wrote “He, therefore, who is now against domestic manufacture must be for reducing us either to dependence on that foreign nation, or to be clothed in skins and to live like wild beasts in dens and caverns”.[i] Jefferson also hints on the advancement in society that industrialization brings. Once America is heavily manufacturing goods, they will be above the pack of countries with agricultural-based economies. This idea of American superiority began to rise in the works of Phillip Schaff[ii] and James Fenimore Cooper,[iii] and it started with industrialization. This began another social revolution in the United States.
Mechanization also allowed the states to be connected as they never had before: through railroads. An intricate railroad system was constructed between 1820 and 1850. The effects of this network touched upon economical and social factors. The connection between the industrial North and the agricultural South helped trade between business owners and plantation owners, and the connection allowed the states to feel more united with their neighbors and beyond. In a report to Congress, the economic effects of railroads were described in detail.[iv] This report analyzed the cost of railroads, as well as how shipping costs are calculated. The report tracks the cost of wheat transportation, which was $22.27 per ton. It also recorded the cost of land needed to build the railroads on. This report marked the beginning of inter-state shipping costs. The railroad network was a huge step in American progress, and was one of the more influential aspects of industrialization in the United States.
            The economy is what was most affected by industrialization, more so in the North than the South. In the North, factories were the main source of jobs and economical growth. People worked at machines that sped up the process of making good. Instead of products being hand made, they were now mass-produced in factories. In his book Recent Economic Changes and their Effect on the Production and Distribution of Wealth and the Well-Being of Society, David Wells wrote “Machinery is now recognized as essential to cheap production. Nobody can produce effectively and economically without it, and what was formerly known as domestic manufacture is now almost obsolete.” This statement summed up the idea the every factory owner had in his head at the time. Machines were the open door to success in the industrialized economy. Wells also writes on the subject of employment in these factories. Later on in his book, he writes “The whole number of employees in the cotton mills of the United States, according to the census of 1880, was 172,544; of this number, 59,685 were men and 112,859 women and children. In Massachusetts, out of 61,246 employees in the cotton mills, 22,180 are males; 31,496, women; and 7,570, children.” Factories created a shocking amount of jobs in American, allowing people to buy houses and consume because of a regular salary. The factories needed all the workers they could get to ship more products out. This mass-production fueled the economy because it allowed more to be sold and traded internationally. Although the quality of these products went down, the quaintly skyrocketed. That did not seem to matter, as profit was the highest of priorities.
Industrialization was all about success and profit. The workers in the factories suffered from long hours, safety hazards, and low wages. Writer Carroll D. Wright studied the effects on the mentalities of the individual worker in her writings.[v] This kind of neglect of the individual provoked the drastic decrease in product quality, as well an increase in workers discontent.[vi] The safety hazards cost many workers their limbs, and on some occasions, their lives. Records prove that thousands of workers died in the factories, more so than in Britain. Miners also died by the thousands. In a British study, researchers found that over five thousand American miners died between the years of 1890 and 1894, while just over one thousand died in Britain. The machines were economical, but they were also enormously unsafe. The increasingly low wages also forced a decline in motivation for the individual to do a good job on his or her part. The work was hard and sometimes immoral, but it was needed. Without industrialization, employment and crime would have increased tenfold. Although industrialization had negative effects on individual men, women, and children, the nation as a whole benefited.
Industry shaped the way the United States would function economically as well as socially and politically. It was a new world in America, and it effected each individual in any way, from the low level worker to the factory owner, to the soldier fighting for the North or South over differences that could not be solved any other way. America underwent an immense change in the 19th century, more than any other it endured since its birth in 1776. This time period changed America in a way that had never been experienced before. Both good and bad, the country was molded into what it would later become and be able to achieve. Industrialization cause much pain and poverty, but the nation as a whole benefited deeply.
[i] Memoirs, Correspondence, and Private Papers of Thomas Jefferson, 1829
[ii] America, A Sketch of the Political, Social, and Religious Character of the United States of North America, 1855
[iii] The American Democrat, 1838
[iv] 32 Congress, 1 Session, Senate Executive Document No. 112, 1852
[v] Journal of Social Science “The Factory System as an Element in Civilization,” 1882
[vi] The New Era, or The Coming Kingdom, Josiah Strong, 1893
Sympathies Unheard: The Narrative of “Benito Cereno”
In the 1850s, Herman Melville published his most famous and most recognized. One of these, “Benito Cereno,” is the story of a captain who boards a Spanish Slave ship that is stranded on a lonely coast. Published in 1856, “Benito Cereno” is still regarded as an important piece of literature in which the horrors of the slave trade are explored. Melville’s stirring and sometimes disturbing descriptions of the treatment of slaves show the reader the realism of the trade in a very visceral sense. These descriptions make an attempt to evoke a sense of pathos over the reader, but in this it does not succeed. Although Melville tries to show sympathy towards the slaves, his efforts are overshadowed by his latent superiority.
The story revolves around two European captains, so the portrayal of slaves will not be a positive one. An unnamed narrator describes what the main character, Captain Amasa Delano, sees. He is accompanied throughout his stay on the ship by the captain of said ship and the title character, Benito Cereno. Melville describes the slaves as these men would see them, but one could say that this viewpoint wasn’t necessarily difficult for Melville. When Delano first boards the San Dominick, he observes the mix of black and white faces he sees. Later, as he is guided about by Cereno, he sees two blacks making oakum, a tarred fiber, and the narrator notes that “All six, unlike the generality, had the raw aspect of unsophisticated Africans.” This statement already marks the view that Melville holds for the slaves, although it is suppressed quite well. When Delano is in Cereno’s room, Babo (who appears to be Cereno’s personal servant) is looked upon like an obedient dog. Delano watches Babo, and the narrator notes, “Here Babo, changing his previous grin of mere animal humour into an intelligent smile, not ungratefully eyed his master.” The way the narrator shows Babo is very demeaning, and this effect last through his descriptions of the conditions that the slaves are forced to live in while being shipped across the planet. His affect is somewhat diminished by this portrayal.
The plight of the slaves is described, but even then Melville’s superior tone provokes the reader to feel little or no pity for the victims of the injustice he tries to exploit. While Captain Delano is exploring the San Dominick, he sees the slave’s living quarters, and the narrator describes them in what is one of the more saddening passages of the story. “His attention had been drawn to a slumbering Negress, partly disclosed through the lace-work of some rigging, lying, with youthful limbs carelessly disposed, under the lee of the bulwarks, like a doe in the shade of a woodland rock. Sprawling at her lapped breasts was her wide-awake fawn, stark naked, its black little body half lifted from the deck, crosswise with its dam's; its hands, like two paws, clambering upon her; its mouth and nose ineffectually rooting to get at the mark; and meantime giving a vexatious half-grunt, blending with the composed snore of the Negress.” Melville writes this, but no emotion or opinion is evident, like it was in his descriptions of the oakum cutters and Babo. Here he is merely stating what is there, but not expressing any wrongdoing. The narrator appears to believe that the blacks are no better than the conditions they live in. The narrator can describe the stupidity of the slaves, but he cannot express the pain that the slaves may be feeling? That part does not even cross the mind of the storyteller. Babo is a prominent slave in the story, and the way he is treated is another nail in the coffin of Melville’s attempted sympathies. He is like Cereno’s lapdog, and he is treated no better than one. Babo’s portrayal (as well as name) makes the sympathies of Melville seem forced and unnecessary. It’s as if Melville threw them in to avoid looking heartless in the eyes of his readers.
Although a well-written book, the emotion Melville tries to evoke in “Benito Cereno” is a farce. A writer cannot expect to both sympathize and mock a character in his story, especially when trying to get across a serious point. In this case, the moral issue of slavery is brought up, and with it, a broad look at what other industries are doing. The story provokes the reader to think, but at the same time, it cannot be taken seriously. Herman Melville’s attempt at compassion is broken by his arrogant approach.
No End In Sight
           The United States is in a financial hole, a hole that will take a very long time to climb out of. With it’s constant spending, the government is doing very little to decrease one of the largest debts that the country has seen since its inception. With the billions and billions of dollars heaping up, America is clueless.  The politicians do nothing to stop the increase, and the citizens consume more than they need without a second thought. The government’s poor job of handling the situation allows the debt to build up without restriction.
As of November, the National Debt stands at $64.3 billion, which is a decline from the record high of $69 billion. This drop shows some signs of improvement, but even with this decrease, the debt is still increasing at a rate of $781.6 billion a year. This “improvement” is only temporary.
Even more recently, the value of the dollar was surpassed by the Euro, which hit $1.30 as of November twenty fifth. This raises even more concern. Not only does this incredible debt cripple the American economy, but it also allows the economies of other rival nations to expand and become far more stable than our own. This may be the death knell of the economic power of the U.S., unless the government can do something about it. The Bush Administration is downplaying the crisis that is on hand, and covering up the effect that this financial abyss will have on the country as a whole. The government that should be handling this crisis does nothing but keep citizens ignorant of what is happening around them.
The war in Iraq is not helping matters in the least. Every day, the nation’s budget spends billions on a war that has met little success over the past three years. This wasted money puts a solution further and further out of reach. The Bush Administration needs to stop playing peacemaker and focus on the needs of their own country instead of those halfway around the world. By ending the unjust involvement of America in Iraq and using that money to decrease the public debt, there can be an even bigger improvement that the miniscule one that the government is playing off as something of great importance. The corporations will have to take a backseat on Bush’s priorities list and decrease the import of foreign goods while increasing the exports of American-made goods. This way, the debt will be in check and a light can be seen at the end of this long, long tunnel.
How Successful Were Economic Transformations In America?
By: Justin Mahmud
 Throughout the course of history, nations havecompeted with one another in the race for economicsupremacy.  Economy is the system in which a nation orcountry handles currency and international affairsinvolving goods or money, however systems of economyhave not always been as developed and advanced as theyare today. ( Forms of economic transformations havetaken place first).  Such transformations arenecessary in nations who are perceived as powerhousesin the wild in terms of economy.  A perfect example ofthis is our very own nation, the United States.  TheUnited States has had its’ share of economictransformations which have helped boost its economicposition amongst other nations.  There have been threekey transformations in America which include trade(specifically trade for slaves), industrialization andlaissez faire capitalism. All of these havecontributed to the undisputed success of the Americaneconomy. America’s utilization of these economictransformations have laid the most successfulfoundation for nations to follow.               One of the most controversial but successful economictransformation in America was the development of theslave trade involving America with other nations.  Thefirst real major slave trade was the transatlantic andtriangle trade.  This transatlantic slave trade,lasting from 1450 to around 1850,   held an incredibleeffect on nations such as America, Europe and Africa. Trade has always held significant economic meaning tonations because of the increase of trade brings goodsand money but no trade held more significance toAmerican economy as the transatlantic slave trade(triangle trade) did.  This trade involvedmanufactured goods from industry, raw materials(including sugar, cotton, tobacco), and mostimportantly, slaves.  Slavery held the key to tone ofthe most significant economic transformations.  Inorder to acquire these slaves, America was dependentupon Europe because European traders expandmanufactured goods to Africa in exchange for slaves inwhich they traded to America for some of its’ rawmaterials.   The amounts of slaves being transportedis staggering(during 1440-1640); nations such asPortugal and Britain are accountable for havingshipping out over seven million slaves throughout thetransatlantic slave trade.  The region in which theseslaves were being transported from Africa into Americawas known as the middle passage.  The slave trade’seconomic impact on America came mostly in the south. Southern United States was based on agriculture whichincludes farm work which requires workers to provedlabor.  Slavery was the answer to this labor and itwas free. With the addition of slaves there would be acompetition of economic growth within the nationbetween the north and the south. There will also bethe addition of entrepreneur-like ideas such as theprofits to cheap or free labor ratio.This allowedsouthern United States to prosper economically.  Withthe progress of agriculture came economic growth withmore goods for trade and there was an increase ofproduction (food).  With the constant importation ofslaves into America provided a constant supply of freelabor workers.  It wasn’t until 1807 when Britainbanned the slave trade; 1865 when the United Statesabolished slavery and until 1888 when Brazil outlawedslave trade across the entire American continent thatthe slave trade finally died out.                 Another key economic transformation that took placein America was industrialization.  The key forindustrialization to become a success in America wasto understand its’ connection to the country’s alreadystrong agricultural system.  The utilization ofindustry for agriculture proved to be successful.  According to Thomas Weiss, “United States labor forceestimates and economic growth,” had shown that therewas a significant increase in the number of farmlaborers throughout New England, Massachusetts,Connecticut, Mid-Atlantic, New York, Pennsylvania andeast which was mainly due to the opening of newindustries such as shoe industries and cottontextiles.  Industrialization was also successfulbecause although these were many areas for goodfarming and agriculture, it does not mean thatfarmland is available everywhere.  So in the areas inwhich there was no farmland, cotton textiles weredeveloped; it was later spread to areas which wereprosperous in agriculture.  Cotton textiles involvedthe production of cotton (clothing) throughproductions of spinning machines which was also a formof industry.  Clothing was obviously something thatdirectly brought economic growth through sales andtrade.  This industry was successful because the ideaof profit became key due to the cost of production wasbetter than their selling price.  The sectionalism ofAmerica had also helped the growth of industry becausethe east was so dominant with industry in caused areassuch as the Midwest to try to compete with in turncreates more industry which equals economic growth. This ,however, was not possible until 1840-1860 whentransportation and technology developed which lowereddistribution costs.  Industrialization was a keyeconomic transformation because it is able to providenew jobs for our society and allows the United Statesto trade with other nations.                Another significant economic transformation was thedevelopment of the laissez faire capitalism created byAdam Smith.  It held strong economic importance, asevidence it is still the system in place and in usetoday.  Laissez Faire was first introduced becauseAmerica and other nations were trying to take poweraway from controlling rulers or overly poweredgovernments.  Laissez Faire is a system in whichgovernments can have no say or involvement withregulations of private or independent businesses. This was key to economic growth because now businessowners were able to manage their businesses in theirown way, one example is they would no longer have toaccept government issued prices, they can now setprices as they see fit. (more economic freedom).  Somemay argue that this economic equality has potentialfor success but also has the same potential forfailure.  Although this may have some truth, LaissezFaire was a necessary economic transformation for oureconomy and democracy. It was necessary becauseAmerica has called itself the land of the free whilethe free while they emulate the economic systems ofother nations, this form of capitalism will giveAmerica a trait of its own identity.               Economic transformations such as Laissez Fairecapitalism, industrialization, and slave trade haveall shaped our economy to this date.  Its’ success inundisputed; the United States has become an economicalpowerhouse and a center of trade.  It has laid a pathwhich is followed and imitated by many other nations. Laissez Faire has helped us maintain a balance betweengovernment power and economic power of the individual. The slave trade has helped progress economicdevelopment in south United States.  Theindustrialization era had helped spread industry toall ports of the United States (not only the north) toan industrial power capable of trading with a varietyof manufactured goods.  This all shows the strength aswell as the success of the economic transformations inthe United States. (end notes)   Donald R. Wright , “Journal of American EthnicHistory,” Volume 20, Issue 1 , Fall 2000  Paul E. Lovejoy, “Transformations in Slavery,”Cambridge University Press, 2000, ISBN  Thomas Weiss, “US Labor Force Estimates and EconomicGrowth,”1800-1860, “ American EconomicGrowth and Standards of living Before the Civil War,edited by Robert E.Gallagan and John Joseph Wallis(Chicago IL University of Chicago Press,1992”
Slaves: Masterminds or Hopeless Captives
By: Justin Mahmud
 Herman Melville’s Benito Cereno is a tale whichillustrates the story of one group of slaves whowanted to change their fates.  The path of theseslaves throughout history was clear.  Slaves on boardany type of a ship usually, no always, meant that theywere being shipped from one nation to another nation. They were treated no better than merchandise or goods. Slaves were considered to be of no equivalence to thewhite man which was supposed to justify theirtreatment.  This however was not the case in BenitoCereno because the slaves were very intelligent andwere led by Babo, who may be the most intelligentcharacter in the whole story.  This idea demonstratesHerman Melville’s belief of the possibilities of whatmay have occurred if slaves were educated on anylevel.  This transportation of slaves changed the wayAmerica handled commerce and trade of slavescompletely.                Herman Melville chooses Captain Amasa Delano as thenarrator and voice throughout the story.  CaptainDelano was captain of the Bachelor’s Delight whalingship in 1799 of Massachusetts.  He and his crew weretraveling along the coast of Chile.  This is where hefirst sights the “stranger” ship which was SanDominick.  It was a ship believed to belong to aSpanish merchantman.  The Spanish were a group whowere heavily involved in slave trade.  Captain Delanohad originally believed this was a ship of distressand set out to see if it was in need of help.  Oncethere, he saw that it held Negro slaves which weregoing to be traded, most likely to be part of thetransatlantic slave trade.               While on board the San Dominick, Captain Delanodiscovers a line under the canvas which stated “sequidvuestro jefe,” which meant follow your leader.  Thisline held a very symbolic meaning at the end of thestory.  While on board, Captain Delano observed ahorrible sight of suffering slaves (so it seems).  Theconditions these slaves had to endure were terrible. The ship was lacking of water and supply and had ascarcity of food.  Melville emphasizes the poor andunlivable conditions that slaves were issued duringtheir transportation.  It is due to such conditionsthat Melville believes should be evidence to stop theimmoral slave trade.  Captain Delano became somewhatangry of who could captain such a ship until heactually met the captain, Captain Benito Cereno.  Hewas in a terrible condition and seemed to be sick.  Hewas accompanied by a slave servant named Babo, who wasthe slave mastermind behind the revolt on the ship. At this point, however this was a situation unknown toDelano.                Here Melville created the sense of curiosity andwonderment in the mind of Captain Delano.  He began toquestion Captain Benito on the first of many occasionsas to what actually occurred on the ship.  This was anexample of the repetition used by Melville.  Benitodescribed the ship as being blown off course towardsLima by strong winds (from Buenos Aires).  Before hecould finish he would break out in a series of coughs. This was very suspicious and noted by Delano,although this and other incidents (anytime Delanowould question sailors or Benito, Babo would find away to interfere or interrupt the discussion.)  Delanowould assume it was nothing, Melville decided on doingthis because it showed the slaves intelligence andmanipulation of stories which managed to fool a shipowner.                This was all apart of Babo’s master plan.  Babomaintained a secret identity as a slave servant toBenito when in fact he and his fellow slaves were incontrol of the ship after a successful slaverebellion.  The rebellion was bound to occur and didoccur because they wanted to end the harsh treatmentof slaves in this way and they wanted to stop thiscontinuance of the slave trade.  Babo and his fellowslaves such as Atufal took it upon themselves tochange their fate.  Babo created the entire story ofwhat happened to the ship for Benito to tell Delano inhopes of lacking control of his ship.  This is anexample used by Melville to show what would happen ifslaves were educated and what they could theoreticallydo.  This whole thing was not discovered by Delanountil the very last moment when Benito jumped ontoDelano’s ship and Babo followed with a blade but washeld back by Delano’s men.  Soon after the canvas wasdropped and it revealed the skeleton of the slaves’master and owner Alexandro Arando which underneathstated follow your leader.  This was done in order toinstill fear in the slave holding ships.  Such amasterful plan created by the slaves raises thequestion of how why Melville chooses to use slaves asthe masterminds of the situation.  It may be due toMelville’s personal views and beliefs of slavery. These accounts clearly show Melville’s positionagainst slavery through means of poor conditions.  Theplan by Babo also demonstrates Melville’s belief ofthe inevitable situation with slavery.  He believesthat with the continuance of the slave trade will comeviolent slave rebellions and other forms of slaveuprisings.  It is instances and similarities like thiswhich have shaped American’s laws of trade andcommerce with compromises such as the Compromise of1850, which discontinued the importation of slaves.     
Modern TImes Call for Modern Methods of Economy
By: Justin Mahmud
America’s Federal Reserve is the organization
intended to make sure inflation does not become a
problem.  Inflation is the general rise in prices
brought about to the increase in the ratio of currency
and credit to the goods available.  The Federal
Reserve chairman Ben S. Bernanke believes that is a
problem for business owners to increase their prices
when more money is put into circulation.  Mr. Bernanke
believes the recent setting prices presents,
“substantial uncertainties,” which can bring a large
amount of inflation.  He also believes the one factor
the Federal Reserve should watch is labor costs. 
Although they can not regulate labor costs, they do
have the power to increase or decrease interest rates
and even if economic growth is expected inflation
remained “uncomfortably high.”  The Federal Reserve is
approaching inflation in the wrong way and should
address it’s direct connection with Laissez Faire
economics.
            Adam Smith created the economic transformation of
Laissez Faire.  Its’ purpose was to separate
government authority and regulation from small
businesses and how they are run.  Although Laissez
Faire proved successful at giving the people more
power and taking some away from the government during
Smith’s day and age, this policy has not maintained
its’ effectiveness today.  But who is to say that
Laissez Faire cannot be modified to fit the time.  A
major issue throughout the history of America was
poverty.  A simple solution would be to put more money
in circulation (can be done by increasing wages or
“labor costs” as Bernanke refers to as).  The problem
with this is that private businesses always increase
prices when more money is in circulation.  This is the
true problem that should be addressed because the only
thing that can possibly change this would be the
government, but they can not change the pricing of
business owners because Laissez Faire restricts their
involvement with public businesses.  Laissez Faire may
have been a powerful economic transformation at the
time of Adam Smith, but it should be altered to fit
the needs of today’s people and address the issue of
inflation and poverty.  By altering, measuring giving
the government some control in the regulations of
prices. 
 
