Wednesday, December 20, 2006

How Successful Were Economic Transformations In America?

By: Justin Mahmud

Throughout the course of history, nations have
competed with one another in the race for economic
supremacy.  Economy is the system in which a nation or
country handles currency and international affairs
involving goods or money, however systems of economy
have not always been as developed and advanced as they
are today. ( Forms of economic transformations have
taken place first).  Such transformations are
necessary in nations who are perceived as powerhouses
in the wild in terms of economy.  A perfect example of
this is our very own nation, the United States.  The
United States has had its’ share of economic
transformations which have helped boost its economic
position amongst other nations.  There have been three
key transformations in America which include trade
(specifically trade for slaves), industrialization and
laissez faire capitalism. All of these have
contributed to the undisputed success of the American
economy. America’s utilization of these economic
transformations have laid the most successful
foundation for nations to follow.
               One of the most controversial but successful economic
transformation in America was the development of the
slave trade involving America with other nations.  The
first real major slave trade was the transatlantic and
triangle trade.  This transatlantic slave trade,
lasting from 1450 to around 1850,   held an incredible
effect on nations such as America, Europe and Africa. 
Trade has always held significant economic meaning to
nations because of the increase of trade brings goods
and money but no trade held more significance to
American economy as the transatlantic slave trade
(triangle trade) did.  This trade involved
manufactured goods from industry, raw materials
(including sugar, cotton, tobacco), and most
importantly, slaves.  Slavery held the key to tone of
the most significant economic transformations.  In
order to acquire these slaves, America was dependent
upon Europe because European traders expand
manufactured goods to Africa in exchange for slaves in
which they traded to America for some of its’ raw
materials.   The amounts of slaves being transported
is staggering(during 1440-1640); nations such as
Portugal and Britain are accountable for having
shipping out over seven million slaves throughout the
transatlantic slave trade.  The region in which these
slaves were being transported from Africa into America
was known as the middle passage.  The slave trade’s
economic impact on America came mostly in the south. 
Southern United States was based on agriculture which
includes farm work which requires workers to proved
labor.  Slavery was the answer to this labor and it
was free. With the addition of slaves there would be a
competition of economic growth within the nation
between the north and the south. There will also be
the addition of entrepreneur-like ideas such as the
profits to cheap or free labor ratio.This allowed
southern United States to prosper economically.  With
the progress of agriculture came economic growth with
more goods for trade and there was an increase of
production (food).  With the constant importation of
slaves into America provided a constant supply of free
labor workers.  It wasn’t until 1807 when Britain
banned the slave trade; 1865 when the United States
abolished slavery and until 1888 when Brazil outlawed
slave trade across the entire American continent that
the slave trade finally died out.  
               Another key economic transformation that took place
in America was industrialization.  The key for
industrialization to become a success in America was
to understand its’ connection to the country’s already
strong agricultural system.  The utilization of
industry for agriculture proved to be successful.  
According to Thomas Weiss, “United States labor force
estimates and economic growth,” had shown that there
was a significant increase in the number of farm
laborers throughout New England, Massachusetts,
Connecticut, Mid-Atlantic, New York, Pennsylvania and
east which was mainly due to the opening of new
industries such as shoe industries and cotton
textiles.  Industrialization was also successful
because although these were many areas for good
farming and agriculture, it does not mean that
farmland is available everywhere.  So in the areas in
which there was no farmland, cotton textiles were
developed; it was later spread to areas which were
prosperous in agriculture.  Cotton textiles involved
the production of cotton (clothing) through
productions of spinning machines which was also a form
of industry.  Clothing was obviously something that
directly brought economic growth through sales and
trade.  This industry was successful because the idea
of profit became key due to the cost of production was
better than their selling price.  The sectionalism of
America had also helped the growth of industry because
the east was so dominant with industry in caused areas
such as the Midwest to try to compete with in turn
creates more industry which equals economic growth. 
This ,however, was not possible until 1840-1860 when
transportation and technology developed which lowered
distribution costs.  Industrialization was a key
economic transformation because it is able to provide
new jobs for our society and allows the United States
to trade with other nations. 
               Another significant economic transformation was the
development of the laissez faire capitalism created by
Adam Smith.  It held strong economic importance, as
evidence it is still the system in place and in use
today.  Laissez Faire was first introduced because
America and other nations were trying to take power
away from controlling rulers or overly powered
governments.  Laissez Faire is a system in which
governments can have no say or involvement with
regulations of private or independent businesses. 
This was key to economic growth because now business
owners were able to manage their businesses in their
own way, one example is they would no longer have to
accept government issued prices, they can now set
prices as they see fit. (more economic freedom).  Some
may argue that this economic equality has potential
for success but also has the same potential for
failure.  Although this may have some truth, Laissez
Faire was a necessary economic transformation for our
economy and democracy. It was necessary because
America has called itself the land of the free while
the free while they emulate the economic systems of
other nations, this form of capitalism will give
America a trait of its own identity.
               Economic transformations such as Laissez Faire
capitalism, industrialization, and slave trade have
all shaped our economy to this date.  Its’ success in
undisputed; the United States has become an economical
powerhouse and a center of trade.  It has laid a path
which is followed and imitated by many other nations. 
Laissez Faire has helped us maintain a balance between
government power and economic power of the individual.
 The slave trade has helped progress economic
development in south United States.  The
industrialization era had helped spread industry to
all ports of the United States (not only the north) to
an industrial power capable of trading with a variety
of manufactured goods.  This all shows the strength as
well as the success of the economic transformations in
the United States. 
(end notes)
   Donald R. Wright , “Journal of American Ethnic
History,” Volume 20, Issue 1 , Fall 2000
  Paul E. Lovejoy, “Transformations in Slavery,”
Cambridge University Press, 2000, ISBN
  Thomas Weiss, “US Labor Force Estimates and Economic
Growth,”1800-1860, “ American Economic
Growth and Standards of living Before the Civil War,
edited by Robert E.Gallagan and John Joseph Wallis
(Chicago IL University of Chicago Press,1992”

2 comments:

reform said...

very well written. this article shows impressive strength in in the fact you managed to tie together both political and economic information. however could use a few more dates. overall this article provides a well written and gripping account of economic policies in America.
-mike p.

Econ567 said...

You have a very thought provoking question here, but trying to narrow down such a controversial era is a bit out of reach. You're broad scope does help answer this very panoptic question, but it's too much for one essay to handle.

Keep it real.

- Patrick Murphy